Search
Login
Register

How to stop bullying in our schools

Mon., July 28, 2008

Ever since that fateful day at Columbine High School in 1999, the term “bully” has taken on a much different meaning than when children were told by adults: “Sticks and stones can break your bones, but names will never hurt you!” We now know that this is not a true statement and that all those children who were admonished for seeking protection from bullies were let down by the very adults who should have defended them.

For purposes of this discussion, we must accept or agree on certain premises about bullying. Premise one is that bullying takes place in every school in America. Second, bullying is a social process that not only occurs between adolescents and teens but also between adults, such as in the workplace. Third, bullying occurs when any person purposely attempts to make another person feel inferior or inadequate. Fourth, bullying can destroy a person’s self confidence, which is often low to begin with. Fifth, bullying can result in long-term problems with personal relationships and personal satisfaction.

At the extreme, bullying can result in physical harm perpetrated on an innocent person. This is intolerable. The pain of being bullied can lead to self harm and/or the desire on the victim’s part to hurt — even kill — the bully or the people perceived to be guilty of neglect for not protecting the victim.

We now realize the emotional damage that words can do to a person. A person often internalizes the painful taunts of bullies and harbors resentment not only towards the bullies but those whom the victim believes should protect them. These victims sometimes seek relief from their pain by becoming bullies themselves — deriving a contorted sense of satisfaction from seeing others hurt as they have been.

I have held the positions of high school principal, assistant school principal, high school and middle school teacher, college professor and psychologist. On a daily basis I interacted with students who came to me for help or showed the effects of having been a victim of bullies.

Due to the severe damage that I observed in them, and the personal pain that I remembered from being bullied myself, I developed a classroom policy that I now offer as a model available for use by any school district that really desires to end this behavior.

My approach is unique and successful. As a teacher of a government class required of all high school seniors, I had as many as 40 students in my classes and a waiting list from parents requesting that their teen be assigned to me. I have told every group of students that I have ever taught: “When I was a child I could not do anything about bullies, but now I am the teacher and I will not put up with bullies in my class or in this school.” As you can imagine, this sends a powerful and hopeful message to students who have previously been bullied.

The most valuable tool a child can have when confronted by a bully is that the child already likes himself or herself. A confident child will be able to reject another child’s efforts to demean. For example, when my own daughter first attended kindergarten, another child tried to make fun of her dress. My daughter responded that such comments were mean, and that she would look elsewhere for friends. She was able to do this because, as her parents, we had prepared her for just such a situation.

However, many children come to school unprepared for such scenarios and thus become easy targets. What can be done to stop these situations? I recommend that schools have a clear policy regarding bullying, and that parents be informed of the policy and how it will be enforced. (While the Michigan Department of Education has a formal policy that deals with bullying, the content of that document mainly deals with definitions and terms rather than strategies to correct the problem.) Teachers should be trained on how to explain the policy to students and carry it out, starting on day one in every class. In my own work, this was my procedure:

  1. On my door was a sign saying: “Mean People Not Welcome!” This gets the students’ attention as they walk in.

  2. I told the class the true story that, as a child, I could not do much to stop bullying, but that as a teacher, “I am in charge and will NOT accept bullying!”

  3. I then asked the students to take a “time machine” to kindergarten or elementary school and think about a time when they were bullied or teased, and to recall how they felt. Every student came up with an example, and three or four were usually willing to share their story.

  4. Next, I reinforced the fact that everyone understands the pain of being bullied and the consequences: wanting to cry, run away, or stop coming to school.

  5. Finally I asked this question: “If you know how badly a person who is bullied feels, then why would you do this to another student?”

  6. I then told the students that anyone who would deliberately continue to demean another person, knowing the hurt they are causing, is acting as a bully and that this would not be tolerated in my class. Further, I said that if someone is behaving like a bully, then he or she is probably feeling pain as well, and I offered to get them help.

During the course of the year in my classroom, students became sensitive to teasing. They were empowered and encouraged to ask a fellow student if he or she felt hurt by a specific comment. That student had the right to say yes or no, and also to ask for an apology or an explanation from the student who made the comment. Sometimes it was just a misunderstanding, and sometimes not. This process is overseen and directed as needed by the classroom teacher. The result is that all students soon realize that words have power and that their selection of words is important.

This is a very hands-on approach to preventing and stopping bullying. It also provides for ways to help the bully, and trains parents and teachers to assist children, whether the children are victims or perpetrators. I recommend that every teacher try this approach in their classes and observe the difference it can make.

###

A Detroit native, Grenan holds master’s degrees in education and psychology and a doctoral degree in hypnotherapy. He formerly worked as a teacher, coach and assistant principal at Grand Haven High School and as a principal at a USA Job Corps Center in Grand Rapids. Currently he works with the Muskegon County courts system and maintains a private practice. He can be reached at jackgrenan@netscape.net.

Related Topics: Education; Education, Discipline
Michigan Education Daily
"Bay County area schools should conduct school board elections jointly with general elections as a way to save money and have more representative voter turnout." >>
"Now three years old, the Kalamazoo Promise has had mixed results in its mission to send Kalamazoo Public Schools graduates to college." >>
"Grand Rapids and Holland public schools are reporting higher numbers of homeless students than last year and expect the figures to grow." >>
"Nineteen Detroit Public Schools teachers are running for election to leadership slots in the Detroit Federation of Teachers union on a school reform platform, according to The Detroit News. The teachers want to open their own charter school modeled after the Los Angeles Green Dot Schools." >>
"Teachers in Gaylord Community Schools have voted to replace the Michigan Educational Special Services Association with AmeraPlan as a third-party insurance administrator, saving the district about 25 percent on health care costs." >>
"A Spanish language teacher quit her job at Michigan Collegiate High School amid allegations that she had a sexual relationship with a 16-year-old male student." >>
"Wyandotte Public Schools is attracting attention statewide for its 90 percent pass rate among algebra II students." >>
User Comments
Testing is not the answer. All it does is give the "teacher" a basis for determining a grade. And, we all know that grading and grades are circumspect. Rather, a more true measure of learning is when the learner (i.e., the "student" using traditional and aniquated terminology and stereotyping) wants to know more about a topic or issue. This expression of desire for more is an affirmation that the learner has mastered current concepts and material and now wants to move on. In this scenario no test nor grade is necessary. What should be necessary is for the provider (i.e., the "teacher") to have the next level or dimension of concepts and materials readily available to present and apply once the learner expresses the desire to move on.

What we need is a system that is designed to cater to this basal learning behavior and can be applied in real time. Take a look at the definitive treatment "Education in America -- What's to Be Done?" developed by Trigon-International. This commission report presents an end-to-end solution that is actionable and affordable. >>
$400 K, try $400 million >>
Thank you to Lorie Shane and Marcie Lipsitt for blowing off the cover, exposing one of Michigan's "dirty secrets."

As the parent of a child with special needs in Michigan, it's been an uphill battle since day one to get the APPROPRIATE services for my child. Sadly, the bar is held too low for our kids. Upon graduating, if the student is not capable of attending college, he/she is warehoused into post-secondary settings where formal academics are not offered. Perhaps if students had gotten proper academics when younger- taught by highly qualified teachers- many would have had the opportunity to move on and continue formal academics like their non-disabled peers, rather than be expected to dust shelves and bag groceries their whole lives.

Michigan's special eduation has and continues to fail our children.

>>
As a parent I see the value of a teacher with knowledge of both special ed methods and the subject matter. Do enough of them exist to go around? My guess is that many teachers who concentrated their schooling and training on special ed took fewer courses in subject matter (English, Mathematics, Science, etc.). There are limits on course load, number of years in college, and student finance.

As much as we want the best for every person, we are not going to have six teachers each an expert in their subject matter per one pupil. So in this world of limited resources, each person and our society have to decide how to use the resources we have. Hopefully a successful balance of flexibility and accountability can produce the desired results: educated children with the capacity to think and the ability to learn. >>
Michigan High School & the University deliver quality education to its
students & has maintained its standard with good caliber. The courses offered by the Michigan institutes are versatile and for future progress of the society and the students, it further enhances them to become excellent citizens!!
---------------------------
Carol
<a href="http://http://www.treatmentcenters.org/michigan">Michigan Treatment Centers</a>
>>
Thank you for your comments. I would be honored and proud to go to any school district or meeting to stand up for your/our children!! Just EMail me and I will be there or call me anytime at 616-8474282
Thank You, Dr Jack Grenan Educator and Cancer Survivor >>
Parents and teachers have not had a voice. The waivers used have allowed administrators of various Michigan schools to plunk in 20 - 25 students in a classroom of students with learning disabilities. As a special education teacher, I find it very difficult to meet the individual learning objectives of that many students. >>
This article presents excellent information. As the parent of a child with a disability I advocate for my son. Currently, there is no one to speak for all the children with disabilities in Michigan. There is no transparency of government. The position of State Superintendent is a dictatorship with the power to make all the decisions. As a parent, I cannot voice my concerns by voting. >>
Ferndale High School in Ferndale, Michigan succeeded in correcting the mistaken reporting of the Johns Hopkins University report that had included it as a "dropout factory" with poor "promoting power." The University researchers have acknowledged that Ferndale High School does not belong in this category and removed the school from the list because of the school district's high outward mobility (more students move out than move in during high school.). The high school has a three-year promoting power ration of 77% rather than the 50% reported in the Associated Press in October 2007, with the Class of 2006 having a 91% promoting power. Please visit Johns Hopkins' website for more clarification to see the "Schools Removed from the List of Weak Promoting Power High Schools: http://web.jhu.edu/CSOS/images/Removed_from_List_5_14_08.pdf .

Also, visit www.ferndaleschools.org for info about the school district. >>
So you're not going to admit an anti-MESSA bias?

*wink* >>